![]() I keep all of my mail, because I refer to it here and there, and I have found that Outlook doesn't really do a good job of quickly searching across a ton of PST files with this much mail, so I use X1 client for my searches. ![]() I have a PST file for every calendar year, and I set outlook to autoarchive everything older than a year to the previous year's PST. I keep about one year of mail in my mailbox, syncing all to my OST (cached mode keep all). I personally have a total of over 2 million messages in my Outlook view. ![]() We've had pretty good luck with them over the past 10 years or so. OST performance has been good, where PST has been noticeably slower for some reason (folder enumeration and searches), and the horrors of OST/PST corruptions of the past, I feel, are mostly just in the past (whew). We have supported execs with both large OST files and large PST files. However, I'm not sure if Outlook has been optimized more for using cached mode in regards to large OST files, but it is very apparent that using a large OST file has less performance degradation than using a large PST file.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |